The CBO reported that the Obama deficit for 2010 was $1.29 trillion.  The CBO is also projecting that the Obama administration and congressional Democrats will deliver a $1.4 trillion deficit for 2011.  Taking into account the Obama deficit for 2009, 2010, and the 2011 projection, the Democrat controlled Congress and White House will add over $4 trillion to the national debt in the first 3 years of the Obama administration.

The news of the Obama deficit comes at a bad time for Democrats who hope to keep hold of Congress.  Polls predict that Republicans will take the house in the November elections and will come close to taking the Senate.

According to US Debt Clock, the current national debt stands at over $13.5 trillion and climbing.  With the CBO forecast for the Obama deficit for 2011, the national debt could top $15 trillion going into 2012.

Regardless of who controls Congress in 2011, reducing the deficit will be difficult.  Republicans favor cutting government spending to reduce the budget deficit while Democrats favor additional taxes.

The President is claiming that without all of the deficit spending, the economy would be in worse shape.  However, this argument discounts the damage to future years as we continue to borrow money to fund additional spending and print money to pay off the debt.

When the economy picks up again, there will be pressure to raise interest rates.  The higher interest rates on the national debt will mean that the American people will be on the hook for higher interest payments to avoid defaulting on debt payments.

Americans need to remember the issues that excessive consumer debt caused in the recent past.  The same issues will be faced by the entire nation as the debt and the interest on that debt continues to climb.

Putting the federal deficit in terms that Americans can understand, when Obama entered office, the public debt amounted to roughly $56,000 per household.    Today it is $72,000 per household and is headed to more than $170,000 per household in 2020.

According to the CBO, the deficit will equal almost 90% of GDP in 2010. 

It is important to note that the deficit adds to the national debt and creates a death spiral where additional debt adds to the spending that must happen each year to cover the interest payments on that debt.  This spiral puts additional pressure towards increasing deficits.

It is also important to note that deficits are mostly in control of the President and Congress.  For 2010, the Obama administration and Congress chose to spend over $1.4 trillion more than the government makes from taxes and other revenues.  To reduce or eliminate the deficit, the government needs to plan to spend less than what it believes it will take in.  Currently, the government is planning to spend far more each year than what it takes in.

Americans have just started to come out of a debt crisis caused by Americans and businesses taking on more debt than they can handle.  Now the government is making the same mistakes by tripling the budget deficit and pushing the country further and further into debt.

If deficit spending is the way out of an economic downturn, as leftist economists like Paul Krugman keep telling us, then one way to characterize President Obama’s approach to reviving the ailing economy is “killing it with kindness.”

Another is “tough love” – not the kind where you force hard choices and self-discipline, but the kind where you shoot the poor beast to put it out of its misery.

James Clyburn, House Majority Whip, recently crystallized the Democrats’ position on fiscal responsibility when he announced, “We’re not going to save our way out of this recession. We’ve got to spend our way out of this recession, and I think most economists know that.”

Here are some fun facts about Obama’s proposed federal budgets over the next decade:

- The projected deficit for Obama’s 2010 budget is $1.6 trillion, which is 10% larger than the 2009 deficit, which was three times as big as the record 2008 deficit under President Bush.

- The projected 2010 deficit is 10 times as large as the deficit for Bush’s 2007 budget, the latter of which included funding for the troop surge that won the war in Iraq. Nearly matching our accomplishment in Iraq, the White House Travel Office has approved a trip for Obama to go to Cambridge, Massachusetts in November to get a Democratic dogcatcher elected in Harvard Square.

- The projected 2010 deficit will render our national debt 13% bigger on the last day of this year than it is today. Projected 2010-11 deficits will cause the debt to swell 23% bigger than it is now. By 2020, the debt will be twice as big as it is today.

- By 2013 the deficit will recede to $700 billion, a “mere” half of the 2009 deficit, then ratchet up again to $1 trillion by 2020. Even this will happen only if Congress agrees to drastic spending cuts before 2013, which it has already expressed strong resistance to doing.

- All of these numbers are conditional on what many private sector economists call overly optimistic expectations held by the current administration regarding growth of the economy.

These sobering statistics raise a number of tough questions about the measures Obama proposes to bring down the deficit-which, naturally, he will never answer satisfactorily.

For example: in his budget address on Monday, Obama stated, “Because small businesses are critical creators of new jobs and economic growth, the budget eliminates capital gains taxes for investments in small firms and includes measures to increase these firms’ access to the loans they need to meet payroll, expand their operations, and hire new workers.”

Why only small businesses? Why not medium and large businesses? Who adds more jobs to the economy-Sal’s Pizzeria, a local franchise of Linens ‘n Things, or Microsoft Corporation?

Obama proposes letting the Bush tax cuts expire for families making over $250,000 a year. He wants to impose a new tax-sorry, “financial crisis responsibility fee”-on banks and corporations who received TARP money, some of whom were forced by the administration to take it. Obama wants to strip away tax breaks from oil and gas corporations.

So why would Obama want to choke the engines of growth and job creation by saddling them with tax increases? If the absence of a $5,000 tax credit would hinder a small business from new hiring, what does he think the addition of hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes to corporations would do to their hiring? Do big corporations hire workers out of the goodness of their hearts, with no concern for the bottom line?

Also, given that many of those families who make over $250,000 are headed by small business owners, how does Obama justify giving them tax credits while simultaneously increasing their taxes? Is his administration even feigning consistency here?

History shows that cutting individual and corporate tax rates increases long-term tax revenue. Obama was specifically asked about this proven fact by George Stephanopoulos during a primary debate with Hillary Clinton. Obama stated outright that even if this pattern were true, he would still favor higher taxes on the wealthy to promote “fair” taxation.

Obama is free to endorse Marxist policies if he desires, but how can he turn around and claim that his proposal to increase taxes for the wealthy is an effective way to reduce long-term deficits?

When you’re handed a hot potato such as the sickly economy – a fate Obama has reminded us of precisely eight million times since he was elected office-the responsible solution is to let it cool down.

Instead, Obama proposes to cremate it.

http://www.scottspiegel.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Scott_Spiegel
http://EzineArticles.com/?Incinerating-a-Hot-Potato&id=3694855

According to a post at Hot Air, the United States national debt was $12,031,299,186,290.07 at 3:00 pm.  This indicates that it took the Obama administration less than 8 months to add $1 trillion to the US national debt.

The 2009 budget deficit was $1.42 trillion or 3 times the 2008 budget deficit.

Despite what the White House says on TV, its report indicates that the US national debt at the end of  this fiscal year could top $14 trillion by adding $2 trillion more in the next 12 months.  The report goes on to indicate that by end of the decade, the United States national debt will hit $24.5 trillion in 2019 which will exceed the projected GDP.

America is headed toward an economic catastrophe as our politicians seek to gather power today by mortgaging our and our children’s future.  To many, the promises of our politicians sound good, but most Americans don’t think about paying for those promises.

As Americans, we need to demand that our government stop spending away our future to gain power today.

HR 3200 Will Cover Illegal Immigrants - Despite claims from several people in congress, the health care reform bill will cover illegal immigrants according to the congressional research service.  This is exactly why our representatives need to read the bills they are supporting.  If they have read it, they are misleading us.

ABC and NBC Show Their Bia Proudly - Media companies make money selling ad space and ad time.  However ABC and NBC are refusing to allow ads that are critical of the President’s health care reform agenda.  The article contains links so you can view the ad and see if you think it is any more misleading than the ads they show that are in favor of the health care reform plan.

National Debt Set to Double - Early in the week, the Obama administration indicated that the 10 year deficit would be approximately $9 trillion, which was $2 trillion more than they predicted two months earlier.  This means that in 2019, the national debt will go from almost $12 trillion to $21 trillion.  The yearly interest alone on that debt will be more than the stimulus bill.

Ted Kennedy Wants to Rollback a Law He Demanded - Prior to his death, Ted Kennedy wrote a letter to the Massachusetts state government  asking that they change state law to allow the governor to appoint a senator to an empty congressional senate seat.  The problem is that in 2004 he lead the charge to change state law to remove the power of interim appointments from the governor.  At the time, Mitt Romney was governor and Kennedy didn’t want Romney to be able to appoint a Republican to the empty seat if John Kerry won the 2004 presidential election.  Apparently the need of the people to have representation is secondary to the needs of the party.

Today it was reported that the Obama administration blames the 10 year deficit on the current crisis and the Bush administration.  Odd that the White House would blame deficits 10 years from now on the policies of a prior administration all the while dramatically increasing spending to unprecedented levels.   Why not blame Bush 41 or Carter?

One of the most alarming facts is that the current national debt is around $11.7 trillion.  This would lead to a national debt of almost $21 trillion.  This is expected to be 75% of our entire economy.  The interest payments on that debt will severely cripple the U.S. for years to come.

The AC360 blog over at CNN did a nice job of summing up how this will be very bad for our economy.  One striking figure is that it will burden future tax payers with over $900 billion in annual interest payments.  Even if we payed back zero on the money that we are borrowing, we would have to pay $900 billion each and every year to keep the interest current.  One would question where the money is to come from.  Certainly not a 1% surcharge on wealth.

Deficits of that magnitude would be extraordinarily dangerous and irresponsible for the country. They would double the national debt, risk much higher inflation, saddle future taxpayers with annual interest payments of over $900 billion, make us even more reliant upon China as a creditor, and over time would weaken us as a great nation.

Many people are starting to question the estimating abilityof the current administration.  Aside from updating the deficit numbers by almost 30% in a few months, they also changed the estimate for the retraction in GDP from 1.2% to 2.8%.

They have also mismanaged the impact of the stimulus.  Back when the stimulus bill needed to be passed in the middle of the night, the American people were told that if we did nothing, unemployment could get as high as 8%.  With the stimulus, unemployment is now at 9.4% and expected to reach over 10%.

This doesn’t even take into account the impacts of health care reform which the CBO estimates will cost trillions.

At some point we need to decide that the federal government can not keep borrowing from the future to pay for items that special interest groups are demanding.

You also constantly hear President Obama talk about the deficit that he inherited from George Bush.  Let us just pray that we are able to do similar math with any sum that we inherit.

Recently, Steny Hoyer told UVA graduates that Obama inherited a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit.  However, last reports I saw indicated that Bush left office with a deficit somewhere between $400 and $500 trillion.  It has been in the first six months of the Obama administration that the deficit has quadrupled to over $1.85 trillion according to the CBO.

There is a great article over at hotairthat details the inconsistencies of Hoyer’s statements.  The article also includes this great chart:

The article also lays out the truth about government spending.

In fact, Congress appropriates federal spending, not the President, in our system of government.  The President can propose spending, but Congress makes the final decisions on appropriations and spending levels.

Over the last 2 years, the democrats have been in charge of how much money the government spends not the president.  The president can propose spending levels, but Congress sets the final numbers.  When the Republicans where in charge, they were also reckless with our money.  However, Obama and the democrats have reach unprecedented levels of debt.  Some would even say unsustainable.

Eventually, the American people will wake up and demand that their government stop spending money when the government is broke.  In the end, we all have to pay for this spending and not just through some extra taxes on a minority of top earners.